[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Carpet Bombing



John,
 
I am speaking in generalities now.  I could do research of all my notes and documents, but that would take quite a while and I don't know when I could get to it.  The generalities I speak of are Soviet Unit histories which spell out the mission of the various divisions and regiments stationed in China.  Among the primary missions for most, if not all of the units was to defend the hydroelectric plant on the Yalu.  They always summarize their stay in China as meeting all mission objectives, to include defending the plant.  It is more difficult with the air units, but I do remember reading AAA shoot down reports from batteries stationed by the hydroelectric plant as well as bomb damage assessments.  From the Soviet point of view, the UN seemed to be pretty ineffectual.  If I get the time, I will try an go into more detail.
 
Danz
-----Original Message-----
From: Jhk789@aol.com [mailto:Jhk789@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:52 PM
To: KOREAN-WAR-L@raven.cc.ku.edu
Subject: Re: Carpet Bombing

In a message dated 11/26/2001 5:38:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, Danz.Blasser@osd.mil writes:


Soviet documents in their archives stated that they oppossed the missions on the dam and that they were quite successful in defending it, both with AAA and with MIGs.


Danz,

Very interesting to hear that!

Do you have more info on that?
Do they tell how many MIGs were sent up?
How many US planes do they claim to have shot down?

How about the official US history?
Does the Pentagon admit any loss of planes
on those two days' missions over Suhio Dam?

John 2