[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Sir Charles" Willoughby
>Marc,
> >>Ed, you've read Fertig. Read further. A LOT further! The stuff is there.
> Willoughby was the fellow who fought the Navy to a standstill over
>diverting missions to the Philippines to deliver supplies. Ind's ALLIED
>INTELLIGENCE BUREAU is a good starting place; Clayton James and the
>sources cited therein is also important.<<
Yes. I've read,and talked or exchanged letters with, Fertiq, as well as
Blackburn and a number of others while they were still alive. And your
example of Willoughby fighting the Navy, while true, did not take place
until after the guerrillas were already up an running. AIB also was a
latecomer, so to speak.
There is a SWPA Intelligence study under WWII on Carlisle's web site on
guerrilla resistance in the PI.
http://carlislewww.army.mil/usamhi/DL/chron.htm
But, we'd better take this discussion to MILHST-L or WWII-L, where it
belongs.
> >>Which proves my point! The CIA gave nothing to FEC; FEC gave nothing to
>the CIA. When MacArthur pointed out to the JCS, following CHROMITE, that
>any analysis he gave of the chance of CHICOM intervention was flawed in
>that he lacked CIA data, the JCS simply demanded that he base his analysis
>on the information he had -- and then blamed him later for the inadequacy
>of the analysis!<<
It is also a good question about how much the CIA actually had to offer in
the first place, even it there had been good communication/information
exchange between FECOM and the CIA, since when the KW began the Agency had
only a station chief, one case officer and a typist, all at the Embassy.
Ed
Ed Evanhoe, PO Box 916, Antlers, OK, 74523
Author: DARKMOON: Eighth Army Special Operations in the Korean War
Life Member: Special Forces & Special Operations Associations
Co-List owner: KOREAN-WAR-L Web Site: http://www.korean-war.com