[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ROKA
Well let me make this personal.
I can say anything I want to at any time in this country.
You do not like what I say TOUGH..
BITE ME...
>From your postings I know far more then you.
and digging every day.
Your are wannbe ..
Please join the Ashcroft Club as you would fit in with your Swastika.
Daniel T. Fahey
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-KOREAN-WAR-L@raven.cc.ku.edu
[mailto:owner-KOREAN-WAR-L@raven.cc.ku.edu]On Behalf Of James Robert
Dennis III
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:47 PM
To: KOREAN-WAR-L@raven.cc.ku.edu
Subject: RE: ROKA
As I recall, you are the one that whines about why Klinton gets no
respect. Clean up your act first. You have been practicing unacceptable
and stupid things on this list for a long time.
As YSK has well known for posting stupid and incomplete information, I am
challenging him to get his act together. Just like you need to get your
act together.
I know what kind of Artillery, armored vehicles, and there were a few but
not many, and the small arms that were available to the ROK Army. You
and YSK don't.
>ROKA
>If you want to disagree.. disagree
>Name calling and dirges against others are not acceptable in the
Listserver.
>
>There is a lot of information being distributed and new stuff being
>discovered.
>BTW.. we all know what War Material SK and NK had before the war officially
>began.
>Just peal back a few months of posting and you will find a pile of
>information.
>
>Dan Fahey
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-KOREAN-WAR-L@raven.cc.ku.edu
>[mailto:owner-KOREAN-WAR-L@raven.cc.ku.edu]On Behalf Of James Robert
>Dennis III
>Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 PM
>To: KOREAN-WAR-L@raven.cc.ku.edu
>Subject: Re: ROKA
>
>
>Perhaps you could tell us the type of Artillery the ROK Army had in May
>1950? Give us the country of origin, the caliber and so on.
>
>What type of APC did the ROK Army have in May 1950? Again give us the
>country of origin and the name/nomenclature of the vehicle. BTW 6X6
>trucks don't count.
>
>Tell us the type of "fighter" aircraft the ROK Air Force had.
>
>Your credibility has really gotten worse than John's. Does it worry you
>that you are considered a fool?
>
>The North Koreans didn't get a very large navy from the Soviets. The
>Soviets weren't a "naval power" or oriented that way in the 1930s-50s.
>As the KMAG was primarily Army Officers, it would be expected that they
>would have a rather small navy, and what would they use it for? Fishing
>in the Han?
>
>Rhee's Army didn't break and run because of "rotten officers". They
>broke because they were overwhelmed by a superior enemy. The front line
>ROK divisions, regiments, battalions and so on gave a very credible
>account of themselves until they one ran out of ammunition and also ran
>out of Junior Officers, (Company grade) and Non-Commissioned Officers
>(Sergeants). When in intense combat those ranks die quickly and the ROK
>didn't have a way to quickly replace the losses. Had you ever served in
>a Military organization, you would know that.
>
>Fat Chae was a Japanese collaborator, like most of the South Koreans.
>
>The reason there were no Tanks was because the roads in South Korea could
>not take the traffic, the existing bridges could not take the weight.
>Perhaps you should whine to all your Japanese Collaborator buddies as to
>why the Japanese didn't build a better infrastructure.
>
>The United States didn't keep a large Armored Corps in it's Regular Army
>after the war. Why would it give something as valuable as a tank to a
>country that didn't have a word for the head light of a truck or jeep?
>As to Tanks in Asia, it is a common misconception as to where "tanks" can
>and can't operate, especially by people who have never served on them.
>If you have a complaint, go whine to the Airborne Mafia.
>
>>
>>Rhee had a squadron of fighter planes, heavy artillery pieces and APCs
>>when the war began. In addition, Rhee had a navy better equipped than
>>Kim's and American advisors (KMAG), too.
>>
>>The main reason why Rhee's army broke and ran was the rotten officers,
>>typified by Fat Chae, who Capt. James Hausman said got drunk at the news
>>of the fiasco.
>>
>>How about the no-tanks angle? The KMAG believed tanks were of no use on
>>the mountainous (and rice paddy) terrains of Korea.
>>
>>
>>
>>ysk
>
- References:
- RE: ROKA
- From: James Robert Dennis III <jrdennis@earthlink.net>