[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:
I don't see anything wrong with it either, but today's
military is incredibly politically correct and I am
sure some bureaucrat would have edited that term out
of the book.
As an example of just how PC things are in 2002,
someone in the HQ where I work sent out an email
entitled "XMAS Party Fundraiser." He inadvertently
managed to offend the Christians who wanted to "keep
the Christ in Christmas," as well as the
non-Christians and non-believers who don't want to be
left out.
Mike Davino
--- SDonell73@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 8/3/02 3:51:34 PM Pacific
> Daylight Time, mdavino@yahoo.com
> writes:
>
>
> > Incredibly (at least it is in today's day and age)
> the Army's official
> >
>
> I have that book and am reading it now. I see
> nothing wrong with that as
> that's what that hill was called, and in the name of
> historical accuracy,
> it's appropriate. Apparently the ROK's found nothing
> wrong with it.
>
> Sandy
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re:
- From: Love Shack <Home@DanSources.com>
- Re:
- From: "Janet Valentine" <valent03@bellsouth.net>
- References:
- Re:
- From: <SDonell73@aol.com>
- Prev by Date:
Re:
- Next by Date:
Re:
- Prev by thread:
Re:
- Next by thread:
Re:
- Index(es):