Re: "The Inchon Landing: An Example of Brilliant Generalship"

["Love Shack" <Home@DanSources.com>]

Hi Gene:

What went on that you think Eisenhowers stated intent extended the conflict?

 

Dan

 

----- Original Message -----

From: walter e wallis

To: KOREAN-WAR-L@listproc.cc.ku.edu

Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 2:44 PM

Subject: RE: "The Inchon Landing: An Example of Brilliant Generalship"

I always believed that Ike's promise to go to Korea and end the war heartened communist resistance and prolonged the killing.

 

Gene

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-KOREAN-WAR-L@listproc.cc.ku.edu [mailto:owner-KOREAN-WAR-L@listproc.cc.ku.edu]On Behalf Of Bartning@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:16 AM
To: KOREAN-WAR-L@listproc.cc.ku.edu
Subject: Re: "The Inchon Landing: An Example of Brilliant Generalship"

In a message dated 8/13/2003 6:40:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Home@DanSources.com writes:

Eisenhower was a pragmatic leader.
I think guidance by many of the agencies compromised
his Leadership on many positions not related to Korea.

Eisenhower was only president from January to July of '53 as far as the conflict went.  He had nothing to do with Inchon which occurred on September 15, 1950, according to Mike Yared's post which began this thread...  Are you saying his "brilliant generaliship" helped lead to the July 27th ceasefire?

Vincent