[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Harry Truman



Well!! Inspire, first there has to be one to have an argument.

Dan
 

walter e wallis wrote:

The Korean war was abandoned by Ike. See earlier correspondence on this. I suggest you set up another site if you want to piss on the current President so I can respond without clouding the issue.Inspire 28
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-KOREAN-WAR-L@listproc.cc.ku.edu [mailto:owner-KOREAN-WAR-L@listproc.cc.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Love Shack
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 2:21 PM
To: KOREAN-WAR-L@listproc.cc.ku.edu
Subject: Re: Harry Truman
 
Truman was 100% correct.He was the Commander in Chief not MacArthur.Reading more about what was going on inside the militaryand the feifdoms I would have done the same thing. Truman had a large country to run.MacArthur was only one pf the players. Today it is the other way around we have no President.Being rendered irrelevant AND THAT IS DANGEROUS. Dan Fahey  
----- Original Message -----
From: swan
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 3:21 PM
Subject: Harry Truman
    He was a cantankerous guy, at times. In his oral biography, Plain Speaking, he said to the author, Merle Miller, "They say I was ambitious. I never was ambitious. If the only thing I'd ever done in my life was be the best damn battery commander I could be, I'd have settled for that."   But when he spoke of firing Gen. MacArthur he said, "I fired him because he wouldn't respect the authority of the President .... I didn't fire him because he was a dumb SOB, although he was, but that's not against the law for generals. If it was, half to three-quarters of them would be in jail."   With a Commander-in-Chief who thought like this it is no wonder we didn't win the war. Bob Dove