Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Kunsan and Inchon landings, Sept 12 & 15, 1950, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Kunsan and Inchon landings, Sept 12 & 15, 1950, robert guertin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Kunsan and Inchon landings, Sept 12 & 15, 1950, DGill11331
    • Re: Kunsan and Inchon landings, Sept 12 & 15, 1950, robert guertin
      • Re: Kunsan and Inchon landings, Sept 12 & 15, 1950, Love Shack
      • Truman and the Marines, M. Katz
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Glen Boren
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Ben Frank
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
      • Re: Truman and the Marines: TRUMAN refered to something that caused strong dislike or annoyance., rbmooney
      • Re: Truman and the Marines: TRUMAN refered to something that caused strong dislike or annoyance., Love Shack
  • Re: Kunsan and Inchon landings, Sept 12 & 15, 1950, Bartning
  • Re: Kunsan and Inchon landings, Sept 12 & 15, 1950, Bartning
    • Re: Kunsan and Inchon landings, Sept 12 & 15, 1950, Love Shack
• Passing of Gen. Ray Davis, M. Katz
  • Re: Passing of Gen. Ray Davis, Mike Davino
    • Re: Passing of Gen. Ray Davis, Love Shack
• _The Manchurian Candidate_ 1962, Bartning
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: _The Manchurian Candidate_ 1962, Bartning
  • Re: _The Manchurian Candidate_ 1962, AMPSOne
  • Re: _The Manchurian Candidate_ 1962, Bartning
  • Re: _The Manchurian Candidate_ 1962, AMPSOne
• URL's needed, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: URL's needed, Les Hanson
    • Re: URL's needed, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: URL's needed, rbmooney
      • Re: URL's needed, Les Hanson
      • Re: URL's needed, Glen Boren
      • Re: URL's needed, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: URL's needed, Les Hanson
• need description of ordinance, rbmooney
  • Re: need description of ordinance, Ed Evanhoe
    • Re: need description of ordinance, rbmooney
  • Re: need description of ordinance, robert guertin
    • Re: need description of ordinance, rbmooney
      • Re: need description of ordinance, robert guertin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: need description of ordinance, AMPSOne
• namsi raid, maryvretis
• Inchon Invasion, Richard Tunison
  • Re: Inchon Invasion, Love Shack
  • Re: Inchon Invasion, Young Kim
  • Re: Inchon Invasion, Ed Evanhoe
    • Re: Inchon Invasion, Richard Tunison
      • Re: Inchon Invasion, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: Inchon Invasion, Young Kim
    • Re: Inchon Invasion, M. Katz
      • Re: Inchon Invasion, Ed Evanhoe
• Re: Truman and the Marines, Gernilee Carter
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, Bartning
    • Re: Truman and the Marines, Ed Evanhoe
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, Walter E. Wallis, P.E.
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, Ben Frank
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Ben Frank
      • If y'all had fought, swan
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Harold Stockton
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, swan
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
      • Final warning to all!, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: Final warning to all!, robert guertin
      • 27th Wolfhound Raiders, Mike Yared
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Harold Stockton
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, rbmooney
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Ed Evanhoe
    • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Ben Frank
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, Bartning
    • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, Bartning
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, ChosinMead
  • Fwd: Truman and the Marines, ChosinMead
    • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, M. Katz
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, swan
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, rbmooney
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Ben Frank
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, DGill11331
    • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, Bartning
    • RE: Truman and the Marines, Walter E. Wallis, P.E.
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, Bartning
    • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
      • Flame wars, Ed Evanhoe
    • Re: Truman and the Marines, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
      • Re: Truman and the Marines, Love Shack
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, Riata5
    • Re: Truman and the Marines, Ben Frank
      • RE: Truman and the Marines, walter e wallis
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, ChosinMead
    • Re: Truman and the Marines, robert guertin
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, ChosinMead
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, DGill11331
  • Re: Truman and the Marines, John C Cheek
• Re: Truman and the Marines: TRUMAN refered to something that caused strongdislike or annoyance., Gernilee Carter
  • Re: Truman and the Marines: TRUMAN refered to something that caused strong dislike or annoyance., rbmooney
    • Re: Truman and the Marines: TRUMAN refered to something that caused strong dislike or annoyance., Love Shack
  • Re: Truman and the Marines: TRUMAN refered to something that caused strong dislike or annoyance., Love Shack
• (no subject), Jwscpd8
  • Re: (no subject), robert guertin
• The CIB and its worth, Jwscpd8
  • Re: The CIB and its worth, swan
  • Kunsan and Inchon, swan
    • Re: Kunsan and Inchon, rbmooney
      • Re: Kunsan and Inchon, swan
      • Re: Kunsan and Inchon, rbmooney
• Harry Truman, swan
  • Re: Harry Truman, Love Shack
    • RE: Harry Truman, walter e wallis
      • Re: Harry Truman, Love Shack
• Re: Kunsan and Inchon, John C Cheek
  • Re: Kunsan and Inchon, rbmooney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Kunsan and Inchon, Bartning
  • Re: Kunsan and Inchon, Bartning
    • Re: Kunsan and Inchon, rbmooney
• Re: Truman and the pay raise, Jwscpd8
  • Re: Truman and the pay raise, robert guertin
  • Re: Truman and the pay raise, Ed Evanhoe
    • RE: Truman and the pay raise, walter e wallis
• They fought cheap, swan
  • RE: They fought cheap, walter e wallis
    • Re: They fought cheap, swan
  • RE: They fought cheap, walter e wallis
• WARNING!, Ed Evanhoe
• USAF LOSSES, DJWinSTL
• War and Peace, swan
  • Re: War and Peace, rbmooney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: War and Peace, Bartning
    • Re: War and Peace, rbmooney
      • Re: War and Peace, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: War and Peace, rbmooney
  • Re: War and Peace, AMPSOne
    • Re: War and Peace, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: War and Peace, Jwscpd8
  • Re: War and Peace, Bartning
  • Re: War and Peace, Bartning
  • Re: War and Peace, Bartning
    • Re: War and Peace, Ed Evanhoe
    • Re: War and Peace, Harold Stockton
• Re: If y'all had fought, Jwscpd8
  • RE: If y'all had fought, walter e wallis
• The Young-do Partisans, Young Kim
• Historical accuracy, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Historical accuracy, Joe Brennan
    • Re: Historical accuracy, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: Historical accuracy, robert guertin
  • Re: Historical accuracy, robert guertin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Historical accuracy, DGill11331
  • Re: Historical accuracy, DGill11331
• We are still wiondering, swan
• Gen. Davis;, Bill Scott
• Military Integration, John Baker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Military Integration, John C Cheek
• The US CIA Young-do Partisans - Part II, Young Kim
• The US CIA Young-do Partisans - Part III, Young Kim
• War and Peace?, Jwscpd8
  • Re: War and Peace?, swan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: War and Peace?, Bartning
• The US CIA Young-do Partisans - Part IV, Young Kim
• Inch'on, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Inch'on, swan
    • Re: Inch'on, swan
  • Re: Inch'on, rbmooney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Inch'on, Riata5
  • Re: Inch'on, ChosinMead
  • Re: Inch'on, ChosinMead
    • Re: Inch'on, swan
  • Re: Inch'on, DGill11331
    • Re: Inch'on, swan
  • Re: Inch'on, ChosinMead
  • Re: Inch'on, Jwscpd8
    • Re: Inch'on, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Inch'on, CLAUDE LOESCH
  • Re: Inch'on, DGill11331
• 8th Hussars, rcm8605
• The US CIA Young-do Partisans - Part V, Young Kim
• Boarding the landing craft, swan
  • Re: Boarding the landing craft, swan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Boarding the landing craft, ChosinMead
  • Re: Boarding the landing craft, DGill11331
    • Re: Boarding the landing craft, Richard Tunison
      • Re: Boarding the landing craft, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: Tomb of the Unknowns, Harold Stockton
  • Re: Boarding the landing craft, ChosinMead
• Rain and foxholes, swan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Rain and foxholes, ChosinMead
    • Re: Rain and foxholes, swan
  • Re: Rain and foxholes, ChosinMead
    • Re: Rain and foxholes, swan
  • Re: Rain and foxholes, ChosinMead
• Any idea as to where., Jwscpd8
  • Re: Any idea as to where., robert guertin
  • Re: Any idea as to where., Beth Cullom
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Any idea as to where., ChosinMead
    • Re: Any idea as to where., swan
  • Re: Any idea as to where., ChosinMead
    • RE: Any idea as to why, walter e wallis
      • Re: Any idea as to why, swan
• Re: Any idea as to why, Riata5
• Any Idea Where?, nanwagoner
  • Re: Any Idea Where?, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Any Idea Where?, swan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Any Idea Where?, nanwagoner
    • Re: Any Idea Where?, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Any Idea Where?, Jwscpd8
    • Re: Any Idea Where?, swan
      • Re: Any Idea Where?, Art Morneweck
  • Re: Any Idea Where?, nanwagoner
  • Re: Any Idea Where?, Bartning
  • Re: Any Idea Where?, Jwscpd8
    • Re: Any Idea Where?, rbmooney
  • Re: Any Idea Where?, nanwagoner
• Re: Tomb of the Unknowns, CRAIG CROFOOT
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tomb of the Unknowns, John C Cheek
  • Re: Tomb of the Unknowns, Riata5
• Death in Korea, CLAUDE LOESCH
  • Re: Death in Korea, Ed Evanhoe
• Question, ChosinMead
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question, Jwscpd8
    • Re: Question, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Question, John C Cheek
  • Re: Question, ChosinMead
• Day of week?, DGill11331
  • Re: Day of week?, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Day of week? - correction, Ed Evanhoe
• Korean War Project for 9/19/2003, Mike Yared
• The US CIA Young-do Partisans - Part VI, Young Kim
• The US CIA Young-do Partisans - Part VII, Young Kim
• Remains of U.S. Servicemen Recovered in North Korea, Mike Davino
• The US CIA Young-do Partisans - Part VIII, Young Kim
• Markings on Cartridges, Riata5
  • Re: Markings on Cartridges, Joe Brennan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Markings on Cartridges, Jwscpd8
    • Re: Markings on Cartridges, Ed Evanhoe
    • RE: Markings on Cartridges, walter e wallis
• The Burp Gun, Jwscpd8
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Burp Gun, Riata5
  • Re: The Burp Gun, Bartning
    • RE: The Burp Gun, walter e wallis
  • Re: The Burp Gun, Bartning
  • Re: The Burp Gun, Riata5
• ArkansasFamilies, Riata5
• Burp Gun, Ed Evanhoe
  • Re: Burp Gun, Love Shack
    • Re: Burp Gun, Ed Evanhoe
      • Re: Burp Gun, Love Shack
      • Re: Burp Gun, Ed Evanhoe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Burp Gun, John C Cheek
  • Re: Burp Gun, AMPSOne
• Announcement of Korean War Commemorative Event,, Ed Evanhoe
  • F80 Shooting Star info - FYI Cookie, Love Shack
• Re: F80 Shooting Star info - FYI Cookie, AMPSOne
  • Re: F80 Shooting Star info - FYI Cookie, Love Shack
• DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA, Mail System Internal Data